<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Damnhandy - Latest Comments</title><link>http://damnhandy.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://damnhandy.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 09:34:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Fun with URI Templates and the Facebook Graph API</title><link>https://damnhandy.com/2012/05/03/fun-with-uri-templates-and-the-facebook-graph-api/#comment-544942856</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Of course! I was involved with the original JAX-RS spec and initial version of RESTEasy. However, the JAX-RS UriBuilder does not support RFC6570 due to the fact that it predates the spec by a few years. It's also very specific to JAX-RS resources where as the Handy URI Template API is focused on the template expression. Handy URI Templates takes some of the good stuff from UriBuilder but adapts it to the new specification.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">damnhandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 09:34:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I want to like SCXML, but executable XML is a bit of a two-bagger</title><link>https://damnhandy.com/2012/05/31/i-want-to-like-scxml-but-executable-xml-is-a-bit-of-a-two-bagger/#comment-544893296</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I gave an example of using SCXML without the XML here:  &lt;a href="http://josefbetancourt.wordpress.com/2011/10/16/scxml-with-groovy/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://josefbetancourt.wordpress.com/2011/10/16/scxml-with-groovy/"&gt;http://josefbetancourt.word...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">josef betancourt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 08:10:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fun with URI Templates and the Facebook Graph API</title><link>https://damnhandy.com/2012/05/03/fun-with-uri-templates-and-the-facebook-graph-api/#comment-544892455</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Have you looked at UriBuilder from JAX-RS?&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://jackson.codehaus.org/javadoc/jax-rs/1.0/javax/ws/rs/core/UriBuilder.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://jackson.codehaus.org/javadoc/jax-rs/1.0/javax/ws/rs/core/UriBuilder.html"&gt;http://jackson.codehaus.org...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martynas Jusevicius</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 08:08:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: URL vs. URI vs. URN: The Confusion Continues</title><link>https://damnhandy.com/2011/01/18/url-vs-uri-vs-urn-the-confusion-continues/#comment-399361340</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Draw a Venn diagram.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jchook</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 00:08:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: URL vs. URI vs. URN: The Confusion Continues</title><link>https://damnhandy.com/2011/01/18/url-vs-uri-vs-urn-the-confusion-continues/#comment-364996328</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Light is on now! and I think I am home. Your post clears up most of my confusions about URI's. Thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Site: &lt;a href="http://dremelattachments.org" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://dremelattachments.org"&gt;dremel-trio&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joao</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:58:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: URL vs. URI vs. URN: The Confusion Continues</title><link>https://damnhandy.com/2011/01/18/url-vs-uri-vs-urn-the-confusion-continues/#comment-284348566</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow im still confused. I still say URL ... :/&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Muffi Beatz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 01:44:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: URL vs. URI vs. URN: The Confusion Continues</title><link>https://damnhandy.com/2011/01/18/url-vs-uri-vs-urn-the-confusion-continues/#comment-189901992</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Even in Wikipedia the concepts URI, URL, and URN are not made clear. The image &lt;a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:URI_Venn_Diagram.svg" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:URI_Venn_Diagram.svg"&gt;http://commons.wikimedia.or...&lt;/a&gt; is used in several articles. What does the color mean? why are URL and URN blurred? A clean Venn diagram looks different.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jakob</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 03:51:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: URL vs. URI vs. URN: The Confusion Continues</title><link>https://damnhandy.com/2011/01/18/url-vs-uri-vs-urn-the-confusion-continues/#comment-143238338</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Most comprehensive data I've read on this interesting subject&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Roie</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 02:15:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: URL vs. URI vs. URN: The Confusion Continues</title><link>https://damnhandy.com/2011/01/18/url-vs-uri-vs-urn-the-confusion-continues/#comment-138011985</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You are right!  When I first learnt to use webbrowsers, I learnt to type the addresses using http: or ftp: for specifying the protocol.  Then, I learnt people refer this address as URLs.  After many years, I heard a new term - URI.  I accepted it.  It was fine until I tried to learn C#.  This where I got confused with the URI term.  Namespace? But looks like I can type it in my browser.  Will my program always refer to MS site to download the libraries and lots of other confused questions.  Turned to Dr Google to find answer only to find more confusions.  Its like in stupid teaching another stupid.  Your answer this time is spot on.  The sentence that say URL is URI and URN is URI connects every bits of information that I had.  Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fauzi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:41:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: URL vs. URI vs. URN: The Confusion Continues</title><link>https://damnhandy.com/2011/01/18/url-vs-uri-vs-urn-the-confusion-continues/#comment-131765491</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it finally made sense to me in the context of XML Namespaces which are URIs (well, IRIs now). This means you can use "urn:isbn:0-486-27557-4" (URN) or "file:///home/username/RomeoAndJuliet.pdf" (URL) for the namespace which makes the namespace unique rather than pointing at a particular document on the web.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;See also the wikipedia entry: &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Resource_Identifier" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Resource_Identifier"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Silberbauer</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 07:13:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The AppleTV is an Anomaly</title><link>https://damnhandy.com/2010/09/06/the-appletv-is-an-anomaly/#comment-76227022</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, Plex is looking pretty good right now, definitely better than AppleTV. But since I don't own an Intel Mac Mini, $699 is a tad steep. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">damnhandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:58:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The AppleTV is an Anomaly</title><link>https://damnhandy.com/2010/09/06/the-appletv-is-an-anomaly/#comment-76175121</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Mac Mini with Plex is still a good solution in this space, but, yes, I agree, the Apple TV isn't the right solution for my needs either.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Geoffrey Wiseman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:05:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: URI vs. URL: What&amp;#8217;s the Difference?</title><link>https://damnhandy.com/2007/11/19/uri-vs-url-whats-the-difference/#comment-53189038</link><description>&lt;p&gt;[quote]Can we say that:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"http://www.domain.tld/somepath/file.php?mykey=somevalue"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;is an URI&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;and that the "http://www.domain.tld/somepath/file.php" part is an URL?[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No, both are URLs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Esteban Ordano</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 22:03:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why bother with SWT over Swing?</title><link>https://damnhandy.com/2006/02/12/why-bother-with-swt-over-swing/#comment-44538197</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's been 2 years, zeeshan.  Where are those findings? &amp;gt;(&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stevebutts</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:58:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: JavaBean Aspect</title><link>https://damnhandy.com/javabean-aspect/#comment-42053285</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I committed the changes in CVS on &lt;a href="https://handyaspects.dev.java.net/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://handyaspects.dev.java.net/"&gt;https://handyaspects.dev.ja...&lt;/a&gt; . However, I updated only the AspectJ implementation. The nested property feature is not yet implemented in Jboss AOP. You can check out the code!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">plamkata</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:58:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: JavaBean Aspect</title><link>https://damnhandy.com/javabean-aspect/#comment-40708714</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The project is at &lt;a href="https://handyaspects.dev.java.net/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://handyaspects.dev.java.net/"&gt;https://handyaspects.dev.ja...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hendy Irawan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:42:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: JavaBean Aspect</title><link>https://damnhandy.com/javabean-aspect/#comment-40708639</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Use AspectJ, it's now the de facto AOP engine, also used by SpringSource.  aspectjrt 1.6.8.jar is only 114 KB.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hendy Irawan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:41:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: JavaBean Aspect</title><link>https://damnhandy.com/javabean-aspect/#comment-40708565</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Use AspectJ, it's now the de facto AOP engine, also used by SpringSource.  aspectjrt 1.6.8.jar is only 114 KB.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hendy Irawan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:40:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: JavaBean Aspect</title><link>https://damnhandy.com/javabean-aspect/#comment-40708405</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Me too, Plamen... :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hendy Irawan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:37:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: URL vs. URI vs. URN, in More Concise Terms</title><link>https://damnhandy.com/2009/08/26/url-vs-uri-vs-urn-in-more-concise-terms/#comment-39373426</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="#comment-121459" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="#comment-121459"&gt;@Garygscc&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;There are no other subsets of URI; URN and URL are the only two specializations. Of course, the W3Cs IRI work (Internationalized Resource Identifiers) might be considered a superset of URI.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">damnhandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:09:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: URI vs. URL: What&amp;#8217;s the Difference?</title><link>https://damnhandy.com/2007/11/19/uri-vs-url-whats-the-difference/#comment-39372103</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No, that's incorrect: the URL does not need to include the extension. Both URIs are dereferencable via HTTP and will return some type of response. The file extension only indicates what type you might get, but it is not a guarantee. Think of it this way:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The URI is a unique identifier that is more like an interface or abstract class. You can't instantiate it and thus you have to use specialization such as a URN or URL.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The URN is also unique identifier that &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;is not &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; dereferencable and is only used as a means to identify a resource. A URN is a URI.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The URL is again a unique identifier that &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;is&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; dereferencable over some type of network protocol and is also used as a means to identify a resource. A URL is a URI.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">damnhandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:04:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: URI vs. URL: What&amp;#8217;s the Difference?</title><link>https://damnhandy.com/2007/11/19/uri-vs-url-whats-the-difference/#comment-39371819</link><description>&lt;p&gt;URI is whole address of a resource but resource extension is not mentioned. in URL we also mention the extension.&lt;br&gt;for example:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;URI:     &lt;a href="http://www.abc/home" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.abc/home"&gt;www.abc/home&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;URL:     &lt;a href="http://www.abc/home.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.abc/home.html"&gt;www.abc/home.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hina</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:32:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Please NBC, don&amp;#8217;t cancel Life!</title><link>https://damnhandy.com/2008/12/14/please-nbc-dont-cancel-life/#comment-39372395</link><description>&lt;p&gt;why cancel a good show you dont really have much of a lineup now. boo to you nbc&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">james</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:27:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adobe XMP Packet Extraction for the Aperture Framework</title><link>https://damnhandy.com/2009/08/09/adobe-xmp-packet-extraction-for-the-aperture-framework/#comment-39372451</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Ryan,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm hoping this is the answer to my search, but in trying to build it it looks like there is a class that I am missing:&lt;br&gt;org.semanticdesktop.aperture.extractor.ExtractorTestBase&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do you have any idea what .jar this class might be in?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;THANKS!&lt;br&gt;-Zac Morris&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zac Morris</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 01:02:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: About Me</title><link>https://damnhandy.com/about-me/#comment-39371708</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for Handy Aspects Library :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jaime Hablutzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:10:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>